Folge dem Video um zu sehen, wie unsere Website als Web-App auf dem Startbildschirm installiert werden kann.
Anmerkung: Diese Funktion ist in einigen Browsern möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.
via Neogaf aus dem Orginal Artikel @ http://semiaccurate.com/2016/05/12/guess-whos-silicon-is-in-nintendos-nx/
- Though Nvidia downplayed console margins, their pride was hurt by the loss in console contracts. All the talk about "focusing on Shield" was a cover for the fact that MS and Sony had soured on them and would not enter negotiations.
- Nvidia team was told to get a console win or "go home." Enter Nintendo, who apparently made off very well in this deal. This to the point that SemiAccurate questions whether this is a "win" at all for Nvidia.
- SA has heard that Nvidia are promising software, support, and the whole shebang at a very low cost. According to one source, Nvidia may even be taking a loss on this deal. (Take the second sentence here with an extra portion of salt)
- Not mentioned which generation of Tegra or which process node will be used or when the handheld is scheduled for release.
- No mention of the home console, but we can speculate what that might be and who might provide the chipset for that one.
Well, for all we know Nvidia could have done Nintendo a deal on the X1 simply to use up a TSMC 20nm wafer purchase commitment (as the X1 is their only 20nm chip, and it's only been used in the Shield TV and the Pixel C, neither are big sellers). It may have been cheaper for them to sell the chips at a loss to Nintendo than to pay a penalty to TSMC for dropping out of their wafer order.
The reason I was talking about it there is that it would explain why Nvidia would be willing to make a loss on the deal. As a point of reference, AMD was penalised to the tune of $320 million when they pulled out of a wafer order commitment with Global Foundries a few years back. That's the kind of order of magnitude you'd be looking at if (and it's a bit if) Nvidia had committed to large 20nm purchases from TSMC and they had to renege on them due to poor sales of the Nvidia X1. They'd be desperate to make the sale to Nintendo, as Nintendo would be pretty much the only customer buying in the quantity necessary to cover their wafer commitments, so would be willing to offer Nintendo an absurdly good deal, even to the point of making a loss on each chip sold, as it would still be better than paying the penalty to TSMC.
![[IMG]](https://my.mixtape.moe/oxcttt.png)
![[IMG]](https://my.mixtape.moe/ktflgu.png)
![[IMG]](https://my.mixtape.moe/dzcyne.png)
Die Kosten sind minimal höher insgesamt als bei Discs.TLDR (which is actually appropriate in this case): YES, a simple thing like trimming your packaging can bridge the cost gap between cartridges and discs in a very significant way.
Willst du mich veralbern? Jedes Wochenende nörgelst du rum, du hast nix zu tun, du arbeitest in genau der Branche und dann is dir das zu kompliziert?Zu kompliziert![]()
Du müsstest das Posting und die Rechnung dort sehen und einen Jubelschrei machen. 
hm? Meine ja nur, dass früher immer der zentrale Vorteil von CDs etc. mit dem Speicherplatz begründet wurde. Ist das heute dann keiner mehr?
Ich wünsche Nintendo da alles Gute. Vor allem wünsche ich Ihnen ordentlich Power. Und zwar am Besten mindestens die Leistung einer Ps4 Neo. Sonst schaut es düster aus, denke ich.